From: Mark Jansen <mark.jansen@reactos.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:13:04 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: [TIMEOUT] Use Int32x32To64 instead of __emul
X-Git-Tag: 0.4.14-dev~248
X-Git-Url: https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=69cd1ebbbd3ea4a248e923a9ece01c6001293d9f

[TIMEOUT] Use Int32x32To64 instead of __emul
---

diff --git a/base/applications/cmdutils/timeout/timeout.c b/base/applications/cmdutils/timeout/timeout.c
index 129a0f1ac9f..7aaddfbf5ad 100644
--- a/base/applications/cmdutils/timeout/timeout.c
+++ b/base/applications/cmdutils/timeout/timeout.c
@@ -155,16 +155,7 @@ INT InputWait(BOOL bNoBreak, INT timerValue)
                 timeElapsed = GetTickCount() - dwStartTime;
                 if (timeElapsed < 1000)
                 {
-                    /*
-                     * For whatever reason, x86 MSVC generates a ntdll!_allmul
-                     * call when using Int32x32To64(), instead of an imul
-                     * instruction. This leads the linker to error that _allmul
-                     * is missing, since we do not link against ntdll.
-                     * Everything is however OK with GCC...
-                     * We therefore use the __emul() intrinsic which does
-                     * the correct job.
-                     */
-                    DueTime.QuadPart = __emul(1000 - timeElapsed, -10000);
+                    DueTime.QuadPart = Int32x32To64(1000 - timeElapsed, -10000);
                     SetWaitableTimer(hTimer, &DueTime, 0, NULL, NULL, FALSE);
                     dwWaitState = WaitForSingleObject(hTimer, INFINITE);